Aus einer Reihe an Experimenten, inspiriert von dem Buch „Nea Machina“: der Workflow ist bizarr, und ist‑zumindest auf dem Tablet‑ohne Serifs Affinity Designer schlicht nicht möglich: moderne Software kann bedeuten, dass man alte Prozesse nicht mehr ausführen kann, hier an einem GIF meiner Katze Miez nachvollzogen.
Eines der faszinierendsten Themengebiete ist der Bereich, wo sich Wortherkunft und Wahrnehmungspsychologie begegnen: hier am Beispiel dessen, was sowohl blau, als auch golden (blond) ist, hier schön an einem Tischläufer meiner Mutter dargestellt.
Damals haben @ariane.konzepterin und ich in einem noch unveröffentlichen Kürzestessay nachgeforscht, wie sich im Europäischen Sprachraum die für uns Menschen so enigmatischen Farben „Weiß“, „Schwarz“, „Gold“, „Blau“ zum Teil nicht voneinander unterscheiden ließen, und zum anderen Teil auch heute noch synonym füreinander in einzelnen Sprachen geblieben sind (man denke nur an die Sprachen Europas, in denen die Wörter Blau und Blond den gleichen Begriff haben, gerade bei Haarfarben).
Ich denke, dass wir in Zukunft diesen Essay durchaus noch veröffentlichen werden, sonst wäre die Arbeit ja auch für die Katzʼ! 😸
Weil mir fast ausschließlich andere Gestalter und Craftspeople folgen (und ich euch), bin ich auch an euren eigenen, bisher unveröffentlichten Arbeiten interessiert.
Was treibt euch um? Was fasziniert euch bis zur Recherche und Arbeit? Gerne per DM, Brief (Adresse steht im Impressum), Email (ebd.), Anruf (du hast doch bestimmt meine Nummer (du Freak)) etc.
Schönen Start in die Arbeitswoche uns allen.
Aktuell wird gelesen: Be so good they canʼt ignore you.
Und wer würde das Buch mögen: Leute wie ich. Also du.
Iʼve been contemplating a tree I see through a window all morning. Wrote down a few notes about how the noun relates more to us as humans than to a tree. And I keep thinking of Adrian Frutiger and how the human relates to symbols. What is graphic design but a translation? #asca
I am currently seven hours deep into my post-degree studies, and I can say that a point or the dot is incredibly difficult to grasp and understand intuitively. I would brag about my library but I think that I really do need all these books.
Forget about balance or lines, forms, all that is high-level.
The point is designʼs machine code, if you will #asca virtualcoworking
I have had a weird day, no, not a weird day: I have felt a stressful noise in my head earlier, like chatter I could not understand, and which only when focussing on it became words, emotions, memories maybe.
This worried me, because I realised that I have no idea what the cause for this noise is. Talking about it with a dear person close to me, I came to understand that while the both of us had a clear memory of when this head noise happened (which later turned out to be what our brains literally default to when unfocussed and unoccupied with external stimuli, called “default mode network”), I had no idea what the physiological causes for the sensation itself were, or in general are.
So I just went to ask Copilot, and you can see for yourself where that lead me to below
ALTALT
ALTALT
You can find the original upload on my arena account here https://www.are.na/block/31536061 with my comments on how two of these books (the more academic ones) are labelled wrong, but I will provide these comments here as well, but first I’ll link you to the commented pdf in my social archive:
Below are now the comments I made about this exchange with Copilot
Caveat lector: None of the Zoltan Torey books are called that, and “The Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory” is not by Rugg et Tulving. Take this as what it is, not what you want it to be.
Second comment
URLs from this interaction, to peruse at your own discretion:
Further quizzing Copilot about the missing books lead to this:
“The Neuroscience of Mind: A Unified Theory of the Human Brain” by Zoltan Torey has the ISBN of 9780262530859 which is actually “Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of Mind/Brain: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain (Computational Models of Cognition and Perception)”
“The Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory” by Michael D. Rugg and Endel Tulving has the ISBN of 9781848727724 which is actually “Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory (Special Issues of Cognitive Neuroscience)”
Close enough in case of the second book, but confused. See here https://ift.tt/2aqud7m or here https://ift.tt/tpmXVBy for my rubberducking/notepadding in public
End of comments
Interesting, right?
The noise in our heads, and what this noise defaults to, is literally the default mode of our brains. We, as far as I can understand it, rarely, if ever, idle. I don’t know if this default can be changed, but I’ll just be cheerful for no damn reason.
Copilot’s quality control for quoted and referenced books is meh, but I don’t think that will stop you from researching for yourself, now will it? Tagging this up with a few sensible hashtag guesses, keeping it away from the archive by not using the tag “code and canvas”, should hook it into tumblr’s internal knowledge database quite nicely.
Much has happened in between then and now, and as I am watching the sci‑fi show Foundation, I notice how often I still have to I stop thinking about myself watching it, but then I am just in the present, enjoying the show.
And quitting rumination feels a lot like quitting smoking. At least, it reminds me of that kind of effort. All these moments of saying “no” will eventually become a sum “no”.
I’ll be gone for a while. Remember those couple of hundred hours of study? I think I can manage them now.
I think I can manage a lot of things now. Let’s see where this takes us, yeah?
I have to ask. How close is your project to being a designer’s equivalent of a jazz musician’s Real Book, or fake book in general?
There are a few, mostly barely associated designers who are looking for the golden grail of making design theory work closer to music theory, so yeah, at the risk of letting that secret out, I just must ask. asca
I’ve been working on something special, a little something that will help you rethink grids, hierarchy and type.
No rules, no thought leadership—just my way of creating. A glimpse into my process.
A small gift to those who have always enjoyed my work.
Keep an eye out, this free guide will be coming soon.
I am looking for ways to switch from having an idea to doing everything in order to fulfill the goal of the idea.
When the idea is from others, hey man, no problem.
But my own ideas?
Wrote down a few lines about this in my morning pages, which are not morning pages at all, and added a footnote there, on page 94:
“ideas travel in groups, or do they multiply by budding?”
I wrote down two ideas, too, which are my goals:
I want to draw figuratevily/create fine art
I want to design computationally/programmatically
I want…
For now, I think that having an idea is about as good as it gets. Spending more time in your own head, thinking about this idea without an action, an execution?
Now that’s just failing to start.
I have just familiarised myself with rock bottom and assured myself of it being solid ground to stand and build upon.
Fingers crossed that writing about this is not thinking about ideas in another medium, huh?