Remember when all of this started to get confusing? Well, it isn’t anymore. Let’s get back to work.
https://t.co/hY3aDzqat7 #asca
Quelle: Twitter
Meine Social‑Media‑Beiträge – offen und ohne Anmeldung
Remember when all of this started to get confusing? Well, it isn’t anymore. Let’s get back to work.
https://t.co/hY3aDzqat7 #asca
Quelle: Twitter
I want to take a moment to talk about our social media project, Medienfeed (media feed)—curated and run by the conceptioner Ariane and me!
Links to our Medienfeed channels are further down ⬇️
Medienfeed started as an idea during my graphic design studies at DIPLOMA University: a way to always stay up-to-date on what’s being written, published, and created in Germany in media and design—especially by other professionals.


It all began with FreshRSS and a handful of RSS feeds I had collected from scripts and lectures. Today, FreshRSS is still at the heart of Medienfeed, but it’s evolved into a service that publishes content on social media as its “frontend.” What started as just two social media accounts has now grown to five channels.
So what does curating Medienfeed actually look like?
Ariane and I manage all the source feeds in the RSS backend. We check if a site fits our content focus and first place it in a kind of “kiddy pool” (FreshRSS waiting list and archive) to make sure the feed works technically—or to tweak it if needed.
Once a feed is ready, we move it into its proper internal category, joining the 100+ sources we now track—mostly from German-language sites.
We post three articles a day to the public Medienfeed channels, Monday through Sunday, no breaks.
Check the list below for all five channels: Threads, Bluesky, TwitterX, Mastodon, and Facebook. There’s something for everyone—follow along and stay informed!
Threads: https://www.threads.com/@medienfeed
Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/medienfeed.bsky.social
TwitterX: https://twitter.com/medienfeed
Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@medienfeed
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61582154595399#
Quelle: Code & Canvas
Mir hat heute ein Internet-Guru erklärt, wie Social-Media 2026AD tickt – klang wie direkt aus Cyberpunk, oder, noch treffender, Shadowrun oder Mage: Bevor du etwas Wichtiges postest, musst du dein Konto erst auf Betriebstemperatur bringen, die Maschinengeister zähmen #asca https://t.co/7K3kEcteWe
Quelle: Twitter
Alright—let’s make this concrete. I’ll translate your patterns into specific setups and decisions that actually fit how you operate.
Your earlier realization about “decorative stationery” is the key constraint.
If a pen survives 2 weeks on the desk → it’s legit
If not → it goes away
👉 You’re not organizing objects—you’re filtering relevance in real time
Instead of “where things live,” think:
| Layer | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Hot | current project (on desk) |
| Warm | likely next (reachable, but not visible) |
| Cold | rarely used (out of sight) |
You naturally prune. This system makes pruning structural, not emotional.
You already felt this with tags becoming a desert.
A flow system:
Input → Filter → Surface
Example:
👉 The key: information expires by default
Tags failed you because they:
Think:
Not classification, but curation windows
You don’t trust black boxes. So:
If not → friction will build for you
This is your antidote to overload.
No saving for later unless:
👉 You’re not collecting—you’re sampling
Because you explore broadly, constraints sharpen output.
This aligns perfectly with:
Right now you prune when things feel wrong.
Make it explicit:
👉 This matches your natural instinct—but makes it faster and cleaner
Based on everything:
Everything should justify its presence by being used soon
Not:
Only:
You work best in systems that
continuously destroy what’s no longer relevant
so that what remains is immediately usable.
If you want, I can map this into a very конкрет IKEA shopping list or a precise desk layout based on your current setup.
Quelle: Code & Canvas
Alright—let’s make this concrete. I’ll translate your patterns into specific setups and decisions that actually fit how you operate.
Your earlier realization about “decorative stationery” is the key constraint.
If a pen survives 2 weeks on the desk → it’s legit
If not → it goes away
👉 You’re not organizing objects—you’re filtering relevance in real time
Instead of “where things live,” think:
| Layer | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Hot | current project (on desk) |
| Warm | likely next (reachable, but not visible) |
| Cold | rarely used (out of sight) |
You naturally prune. This system makes pruning structural, not emotional.
You already felt this with tags becoming a desert.
A flow system:
Input → Filter → Surface
Example:
👉 The key: information expires by default
Tags failed you because they:
Think:
Not classification, but curation windows
You don’t trust black boxes. So:
If not → friction will build for you
This is your antidote to overload.
No saving for later unless:
👉 You’re not collecting—you’re sampling
Because you explore broadly, constraints sharpen output.
This aligns perfectly with:
Right now you prune when things feel wrong.
Make it explicit:
👉 This matches your natural instinct—but makes it faster and cleaner
Based on everything:
Everything should justify its presence by being used soon
Not:
Only:
You work best in systems that
continuously destroy what’s no longer relevant
so that what remains is immediately usable.
If you want, I can map this into a very конкрет IKEA shopping list or a precise desk layout based on your current setup.
Quelle: Code & Canvas
Here’s what I actually know about you—nothing more, nothing less:
If you want, I can also tell you what patterns I see in how you think/work (that’s usually the more interesting part).
Quelle: Code & Canvas
Rethinking my working space. Having put everything into drawers and stationery has put away my tools for good. I have barely touched something not connected to my computer in months now, and I know why that happened: tools I don’t see are tools which don’t exist.
I am fixing this now.
Quelle: Code & Canvas
I mean, I quit them right now, but it has been a long time brewing, so I am taking note of that right here, on my after-hours blog.
So, listen: I have tried GoodNotes and Notability, and I threw them out eventually because, really, I wasn’t really taking notes, although I bet I looked like I knew what I was doing at the time (that is a whole thing I need to get to talking about at some point, looking the part, rather than being the real deal).
All I did was load PDFs into either app, watch the files sync with a Cloud service, and doncha know! I felt accomplished, write some chicken scratch on the first 15 pages of each file, and then quit.
And now, after months of trying to make OneNote be my note taking app, I have snapped over how messy syncing OneNote Notebook is.
I’ll go into a bit of detail here, you can skip this paragraph, especially because I have no idea where I am going with this: I tried to rename several of these Notebooks, as OneNote calls them, just to see the names being dropped, not used, then older Notebooks showing up in the list of selectable Notebooks, with old content having been moved to new Notebooks, all for the sake of creating some sort of order out of the chaos of the previous, what, nine years now. And I couldn’t, and I tried, and it wouldn’t stick, and Cloud is basically just shit I can pat myself on the back for making some kind of progress in, same with typing over writing, it all sure feels like you are getting somewhere because suddenly there is more of something where there was none before, but, for what I am doing, and how my mind works, there is a simple truth.
I can only take useful notes using pen and paper. Drawing and sketching? Different, doesn’t matter there, but taking notes? I need paper. Same with reading. I need paper, and I also need the font to have serifs, because I need to understand, not just have an ease of reading experience, where the goal is to be done.
Having had the recent Windows reset forced upon me turns out to be actually good for me. Earlier, before I snapped, I have felt a deep morosity over yet again spending hours at the PC trying to make something work which had the human as the after-thought for its use, or what the Millenial designers call human-centered design.
So, OneNote went the same way GoodNotes and Notability went before, and I am back in control of a hand on a piece of paper.
Sure, this is my manifesto, let me just send it into the database so you can read it.
Quelle: Code & Canvas

Hi, there is always an open space on the web where you can start again. At least, that is what I think. And, to be honest, I need to think that way, because if I wouldn’t, I couldn’t change myself in any way.
And what I need to start again, is to simulate my own graphic design study. I say simulate because I already have a degree for my thesis about how one could structure symbols and semiotics in space for living on Mars. One of my wilder things I have been up to in the past years.
So, it did take me around six years to actually get my degree, due to what turned out were physical, rather than psychological health issues, and I actually wonder about how I even got a degree in the first place (looking back, I didn’t feel precisely conscious at the time).
Why I am telling you this? Because I have been building a system for myself to go beyond what I have actually learned (and still recall) in my graphic design study, and in order to do that, I sort of need to “simulate” a study I did not have in the first place. Well-rested, not distracted, that sort of foundational situation, a foundation I did not have between 2017 and 2023. So, if you should have health issues, you should get help if you can, health seems to be a holistic state, a broken part affects the whole, as well as all the other parts, if you can get that.
The system I came up with is really simple: you take ECTS and GURPS as your basis, add in the Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition, Bloom’s (revised) taxonomy, and deliberate practice research by Ericsson et al.

And, what you might end up with, can sort of look like this: something sort of an RPG system for skill advancement.
Cognitive & Behavioral Profile (Dreyfus/Bloom)
No systematic knowledge; relies on rules or external guidance
Typical Practice Focus
Orientation, following instructions, foundational knowledge
Typical Hours for Breakthrough*
0–20 hrs
Cognitive & Behavioral Profile (Dreyfus/Bloom)
Recognizes patterns; starts applying basic principles; low situational judgment
Typical Practice Focus
Guided exercises, rote practice, structured examples
Typical Hours for Breakthrough*
20–100 hrs
Cognitive & Behavioral Profile (Dreyfus/Bloom)
Can plan and troubleshoot; applies knowledge with some independence; moderate judgment
Typical Practice Focus
Deliberate practice on specific skills; small projects; self-correction
Typical Hours for Breakthrough*
100–300 hrs
Cognitive & Behavioral Profile (Dreyfus/Bloom)
Holistic understanding; intuitive decision-making; adapts principles to context
Typical Practice Focus
Stretch projects, problem-solving in novel contexts; reflective practice
Typical Hours for Breakthrough*
300–700 hrs
Cognitive & Behavioral Profile (Dreyfus/Bloom)
Deep tacit understanding; high adaptability; can innovate; self-directed
Typical Practice Focus
Advanced deliberate practice, cross-domain integration, mentoring others
Typical Hours for Breakthrough*
700–1500 hrs
Cognitive & Behavioral Profile (Dreyfus/Bloom)
Recognized innovator; internalized skill; creates new paradigms
Typical Practice Focus
Leading projects, high-level synthesis, research/teaching others
Typical Hours for Breakthrough*
1500+ hrs
*Hours indicate target deliberate practice hours; total invested time may be higher due to passive learning, casual exposure, or repetition.
If you check out what I have written about that before, I was musing about how you can get a bachelor’s degree in the same amount of time it took me, using self-study, you can see what the flaw was, or rather is: that just putting in the hours does not guarantee progress.
You need deliberate practice, DP for short. But how much?
Well, way I figured it, for each level you are looking at the following target deliberate practice hours, and monthly DP goals, as a rough guide for everyone, especially the people stuck in /beg/ hell, like me:
Cognitive Shift (Bloom + Dreyfus)
Remember/Understand; follows instructions
Deliberate Practice Focus
Foundational rules, definitions
Stretch Task Focus
Simple guided tasks
Target DP Hours
0–20
Monthly DP Goal
2–4 hrs
Cognitive Shift (Bloom + Dreyfus)
Apply/Analyze; begins pattern recognition
Deliberate Practice Focus
Structured exercises, error correction
Stretch Task Focus
Small independent projects
Target DP Hours
20–100
Monthly DP Goal
5–10 hrs
Cognitive Shift (Bloom + Dreyfus)
Apply/Analyze/Synthesize; plans work
Deliberate Practice Focus
Targeted practice, self-correction
Stretch Task Focus
Moderate independent projects
Target DP Hours
100–300
Monthly DP Goal
10–15 hrs
Cognitive Shift (Bloom + Dreyfus)
Analyze/Synthesize/Evaluate; intuitive problem solving
Deliberate Practice Focus
Complex projects, deliberate reflection
Stretch Task Focus
Novel, high-risk projects
Target DP Hours
300–700
Monthly DP Goal
15–25 hrs
Cognitive Shift (Bloom + Dreyfus)
Evaluate/Create; deep tacit knowledge
Deliberate Practice Focus
Advanced skill integration
Stretch Task Focus
Cross-domain innovation, mentoring
Target DP Hours
700–1500
Monthly DP Goal
20–35 hrs
Cognitive Shift (Bloom + Dreyfus)
Create; paradigm-shifting
Deliberate Practice Focus
Leadership, teaching, R&D
Stretch Task Focus
High-level innovation
Target DP Hours
1500+
Monthly DP Goal
25-35+ hrs
This is a community project, so you absolutely can add your own ideas, comment whichever way you like, use or not use this system. I even added double spaces so that copying is easier, lol.
Below is essential reading material, if you want to read for yourself:
So, that’s what I’m going to do now. Better six years late than not, if you ask me, life-long learning and all 😉
I better update my journal now.
Quelle: Code & Canvas
I’ll be brief: I have spent more than a week, since Friday the 13th, moving all of my backups out of the Cryptomator vault I have built inside my OneDrive Cloud folder, and am now using two external drives do backup my PC proper.
I thought I was very clever having using Cryptomator, and I sort of bet a lot of people feel the same cleverness I did: to build something awkward, and somewhat servicable.
But, ever since reinstalling my PC a few days ago (you can work from a cleaner slate, after all), copying files, and invariably losing files to the buggy interaction between Cryptomator and OneDrive Cloud, I have realized a very fundamental truth about Computers 2026:
they are not broken. There is nothing to fix. Watching Defrag.exe walk through its rectangles in the 90s is no way to do Computers in 2026. The Cloud is nonsense. I am a graphic designer. I am done with tweaks.
I have recently recovered my ideal workspace for my PC, and there is literally nothing to improve upon there.
I think I will use all of my Social Media presence to slowly connect with people who are interested in improvng their craft, over being done, over doing finished pieces.
If you feel that this is the community you also want, we will meet somewhere. I am putting my energy out there.
Until next time, where I will continue building that which I myself need the most.
Quelle: Code & Canvas
Bleibe auf dem Laufenden mit allem, was du wissen musst.